Four months and several patches later, Batman: Arkham Knight on PC has resurfaced on Steam. Before Warner Bros. pulled it down, however, Steam users had pummeled the game with thousands of negative reviews. Now, those reviews H25 have been flagged as “pre-release.” UPDATE (11:08 am EST, 10/29/15): The “pre-release” tag appears to have been lifted from reviews… As of this writing, Arkham Knight as 17,616 reviews painting the game as “mixed.” The first one is what Warner Bros. is probably hoping for more of:cnx.cmd.push(function(){cnx({"playerId":"e3616d04-4972-4839-a63a-c6975e2e9731","settings":{"advertising":{"macros":{"AD_UNIT":"/23178111854/od.kotaku.com/article","CHILD_UNIT":"article","POST_ID":"1739245165","POST_TYPE":"post","CHANNEL":"uncategorized","SECTION":"","SUBSECTION":"","CATEGORIES":"uncategorized","TAGS":"","NOP":"0"},"timeBeforeFirstAd":0}}}).render("cnx-player-main")}); This one wasn’t nearly as impressed: And here’s h25 com สล็อต​ another review from a few weeks ago: It’s not clear if this happened because of how Steam works or if Warner Bros. pulled the trigger, but the publisher finds themselves in an interesting spot. By most accounts, Arkham Knight is a vastly better game with the patches, meaning it’s a different game from the one that shipped in June. It was not a game that entered Steam’s early access program—it was removed because the port was terrible. If Warner Bros. (or Steam) deleted the reviews, that’d be bad. If Warner Bros. (or Steam) had kept the reviews as h25 com เข้าสู่ระบบ​ they were, anyone who visited the page would suspect the game would run like crap on their PC. A more accurate label for those reviews might have been “pre-patch,” but the Twitter exchange I had with a reader who pointed this my way got me thinking. It’s a good point, though I’d argue Arkham Knight is an extraordinary circumstance. We’re wading through some uncharted territory here. You can reach the author of this post at [email protected] or on Twitter at @patrickklepek