Do I really need to sing the praises of AMD's ? I mean, it's not just us who think it's the you can buy, as it regularly tops the charts in other reviews and 'Best of' lists.
Underneath that cache, you've got eight cores, 16 threads, running with a base clock of 4.2 GHz and a boost of 5.0 GHz. That's a little bit slower than the regular 7700X but the addition of the V-cache increases the chiplet's thermal resistance a bit, so AMD lowered the base and boost clocks to counter this.
But none of that matters when you give the Ryzen 7 7800X3D the right game to show what it's really capable of.
In games that are very memory sensitive, the 7800X3D's extra cache can really help and in anything with lots of simulation/path-finding routines, such as , the 3D V-cache acts like a veritable turbo button on performance.
And at just , it's an absolute steal. If you've got an AM5-based gaming PC and you've been wondering whether it's worth getting a 3D V-cache chip, then now is as good a time as any to take the plunge. Unlike Intel's chips, where the peak power consumption is way higher than the standard TDP, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D will barely run much above 120 W, making it far easier to keep cool.
In fact, there's only one thing that spoils the V-cache party. Well, two, if you [[link]] count the fact that Intel's is a better chip for serious productivity tasks (thanks to having more threads and a higher boost clock).
We're not far off [[link]] seeing AMD launch its and even if that's only a little bit faster than Zen 4, it's still quicker. However, AMD traditionally takes a good while to launch 3D V-cache versions of its best chips, so I don't think we'll see a Ryzen 7 for a good while.
So get a 7800X3D, and enjoy fabulous gaming chops for years.